Privacy

Glowforge Aura vs Glowforge Spark

Glowforge Aura
Glowforge Aura
$1,199
Check Price on Amazon
Glowforge Spark
Glowforge Spark
$899
View Official Page
Laser
TypeDiode LaserDiode Laser
Wavelength450 nm455 nm
Optical Power6 W6 W
Performance
Work Area305 ร— 305 mm203 ร— 305 mm
Max Speed15,000 mm/min8,000 mm/min
FocusAutofocusAutofocus
Features
EnclosureYesYes
Air AssistNoNo
Rotary CompatibleNoNo
WiFiYesYes
CameraYesYes
Physical
Approx. Price$1,199$899
Release Year20232024
Weight8.6 kg4.9 kg
Pros & Cons

Glowforge Aura

What we like

  • Easiest setup and operation of any laser โ€” no technical knowledge needed
  • Cloud app with automatic material settings
  • Built-in camera for precise placement
  • Fully enclosed and safe
  • Large design library available

Watch out for

  • Cloud-dependent โ€” requires internet for every job
  • Slower than modern competitors
  • Only 6W โ€” limited cutting ability
  • Ongoing subscription costs for premium designs
  • Not compatible with LightBurn

Glowforge Spark

What we like

  • Easiest laser to get started with โ€” ~30-minute setup
  • Free Glowforge Print software works on any device (Mac, PC, tablet, phone)
  • Built-in camera with live preview for material placement
  • Class 1 enclosed โ€” safe for home and classroom use
  • Wide material library with auto-detected settings

Watch out for

  • Cloud-dependent โ€” requires internet for every job
  • Small 203ร—305mm cutting area for the price
  • Only 6W โ€” limited cut depth and no thick stock
  • Subscription costs for premium design catalogue
  • Not compatible with LightBurn
Compatible Materials

Glowforge Aura

WoodLeatherAcrylicCardboardFabricPaperRubber

Glowforge Spark

WoodLeatherAcrylicCardboardFabricPaperRubber

The Glowforge Spark costs $899 (25% less) than the Glowforge Aura, which is priced at $1,199.

Both machines share the same 6W optical power rating.

The Glowforge Aura offers a 33% larger work area (305 ร— 305 mm vs 203 ร— 305 mm).

The Glowforge Aura has a 47% higher maximum speed (15,000 mm/min vs 8,000 mm/min).