LaserPecker LP1 Plus vs Two Trees TTS-55
| Laser | ||
| Type | Diode Laser | Diode Laser |
| Longueur d'onde | 405 nm | 450 nm |
| Puissance optique | 0.6 W | 5.5 W |
| Performance | ||
| Zone de travail | 100 × 100 mm | 300 × 300 mm |
| Vitesse max | 36,000 mm/min | 10,000 mm/min |
| Mise au point | Manuelle | Manuelle |
| Fonctionnalités | ||
| Enceinte | Non | Non |
| Assistance air | Non | Non |
| Compatible rotatif | Non | Non |
| WiFi | Non | Non |
| Caméra | Non | Non |
| Physique | ||
| Prix approx. | $219 | $139 |
| Année de sortie | 2026 | 2021 |
| Poids | 0.72 kg | 2.8 kg |
Avantages et inconvénients
LaserPecker LP1 Plus
Ce qu'on aime
- 30x faster than the LP1 Pro at 600mm/s
- Extremely light and pocketable at 210g (laser unit) / 720g with stand
- 2-minute setup — no calibration required
- USB-C and power-bank powered for outdoor/mobile use
- Built-in clipart library and snap-and-engrave app workflow for total beginners
Points d'attention
- Very low 0.6W power — suited only to light engraving on soft materials, not cutting
- No enclosure included — optional protective panels sold separately
- Bluetooth only — no WiFi or USB data connection
- No rotary attachment support
- Fixed 200mm focal length — no autofocus unless the optional stand is purchased
Two Trees TTS-55
Ce qu'on aime
- Very low price point
- Compact and easy to store
- Simple GRBL-based operation
- Good starting point for beginners
- Light at 2.8 kg
Points d'attention
- Small 300×300mm work area
- No WiFi, air assist, or enclosure
- No rotary support
- Slower than modern competitors
Matériaux compatibles
LaserPecker LP1 Plus
BoisCuirPapierplasticAcryliqueTissufood
Two Trees TTS-55
BoisCuirCartonTissuPapierCaoutchouc
Le Two Trees TTS-55 coûte 139 $ (37 % de moins) que le LaserPecker LP1 Plus, proposé à 219 $.
Le Two Trees TTS-55 offre 89 % de puissance optique en plus (5.5W contre 0.6W).
Le Two Trees TTS-55 propose une zone de travail 89 % plus grande (300 × 300 mm contre 100 × 100 mm).
Le LaserPecker LP1 Plus atteint une vitesse maximale 72 % supérieure (36,000 mm/min contre 10,000 mm/min).