ComMarker B4 20W vs OMTech Galvo 30W
| Laser | ||
| Type | Fiber Laser | Fiber Laser |
| Longueur d'onde | 1,064 nm | 1,064 nm |
| Puissance optique | 20 W | 30 W |
| Performance | ||
| Zone de travail | 150 × 150 mm | 175 × 175 mm |
| Vitesse max | 600,000 mm/min | 600,000 mm/min |
| Mise au point | Manuelle | Manuelle |
| Fonctionnalités | ||
| Enceinte | Non | Non |
| Assistance air | Non | Non |
| Compatible rotatif | Oui | Oui |
| WiFi | Non | Non |
| Caméra | Non | Non |
| Physique | ||
| Prix approx. | $1,399 | $1,999 |
| Année de sortie | 2022 | 2021 |
| Poids | 11 kg | 18 kg |
Avantages et inconvénients
ComMarker B4 20W
Ce qu'on aime
- Compact and portable at only 11 kg
- Affordable entry into professional fiber laser engraving
- Available in 20W/30W/50W/100W variants
- Works with EzCad2 and LightBurn
- Strong community and accessory ecosystem
Points d'attention
- No autofocus (manual or separate motorized lift table)
- Standard 110×110mm work area is small (optional lens required for 200×200mm)
- USB-only connectivity (no Wi-Fi)
- No built-in enclosure or camera
OMTech Galvo 30W
Ce qu'on aime
- Extremely fast galvo scanning up to 10,000 mm/s
- 100,000-hour fiber laser lifespan — essentially maintenance-free
- Marks metal directly without coatings (steel, aluminum, brass, titanium)
- Compact at 18 kg; LightBurn compatible on Mac and Windows
- Competitive $1,999 price for 30W fiber
Points d'attention
- Small 175×175mm marking area
- Cannot cut or engrave wood, acrylic, or organic materials
- Open design — no enclosure for fumes/debris
- Manual focus only (autofocus version sold separately at higher price)
Matériaux compatibles
ComMarker B4 20W
steelaluminumbrasscopperAluminium anodisétitaniumgoldsilverCuircoated metals
OMTech Galvo 30W
steelaluminumbrasscoppertitaniumAluminium anodisécoated metals
Le ComMarker B4 20W coûte 1,399 $ (30 % de moins) que le OMTech Galvo 30W, proposé à 1,999 $.
Le OMTech Galvo 30W offre 33 % de puissance optique en plus (30W contre 20W).
Le OMTech Galvo 30W propose une zone de travail 27 % plus grande (175 × 175 mm contre 150 × 150 mm).
Les deux machines partagent la même vitesse maximale de 600,000 mm/min.